Maplestory Ring Of Moon Stone

STORIES RIGHT (KER) Falling

L’altra sera mi sono fatto una lunga chiacchierata col mio fraterno amico e gestore del forum di NEXUS, Andrea Rampado, allo scopo di fare il punto della incresciosa situazione che si è venuta a creare con Rosario Marcianò, which has seen fit to complain to us for defamation (article 595 / 3 CP), substitution of person (Article 494 PC) and unauthorized access of computer system (615TER CP).

Assuming that we had behind us as a member by the name of Straker (registered with the email address of the rosary . marcianò@gmail.it from which came the response verification) that is passed off as the real Rosario Marciano, the latter (Without feeling compelled, having regard to the criminalization of the charges, to contact us by phone for clarification or more) complained that after we were notified by the local police station. I will not dwell on the serious inconvenience to Andrea (who had, already in poor health, losing a day's work went by car up and down from Lombardy) and the loss of valuable time for me, nor the damage to the image and reputation of the undersigned and our respective activities. Never as in this case is the saying that "He who sows wind, collects storm" ...

I understand that Marco, who Is a computer expert, had already reported the networking activities of this person since June 2009, but since it has come to our forums to denounce it. On the other hand, Andrea, loyal to the Chinese saying that "if somebody puts it in c.. Or, do not move: his game you would!" Despite the call of "provocateurs" to freeze the forum, let me focus and merely waiting for the false Marciano came in the forum, has traced the IP, the company has tracked where the link originated in a jiffy and has unmasked. This is the result:

Good evening to all

I write these lines after becoming aware of what is really going on between Mr. Marciano and the drafting of NEXUS, I refer in particular to a complaint lodged by

Mr. Marc gained as a result of a growing misunderstanding between the two sides.

Somehow I have also entered in this story, in fact, quite innocently I had the idea to register in the forum with the nick of NEXUS:: Straker:: the nine of this September, what happened next is in the public domain.

is not public domain but that was my real intention in posting these interventions, however, that trace the thoughts expressed by Mr. Marciano in his blog www.tankerenemy.com .

First of all, it was not my intention to take possession of the identity of anyone, let alone to de-legitimize groped or cause problems to him or the forum of NEXUS.

My only real intention was quella di aprire un canale di dialogo costruttivo, attraverso una rappresentazione caricaturale di quello che era il clima instauratosi nei confronti di Armando De Para.

Erano volate parole grosse tra la redazione di NEXUS e i gestori del sito tankerenemy, si parlava di agenti infiltrati, paranoia e questo già da ben prima del mio intervento, quello che ho fatto io è stato di esporre questa contrapposizione che si era venuta a creare, in termini volutamente esagerati in modo da indurre una riflessione tra le parti e tra quanti leggevano quel susseguirsi di accuse reciproche.

Who has benefited from that attitude, I think anybody, and my speech, like it or not, however, has stirred up something, even if, unfortunately, has had the opposite effect of what I wanted to get a further tightening of the situation, culminating in a lawsuit to the drafting of NEXUS.

why I'm here to write this letter this evening, after a chat with Andrea came to the conclusion that what I regard, I extend my most sincere apologies to the operators of tankerenemy Antonio and Rosario Marciano, hoping that want to accept them and I repeat that my speech was not aimed at nor defamation, nor even to their discredit.

I offer my apologies for the preparation of NEXUS and Tom Wood into the extent to which my actions may have contributed all'inasprimento relations between them and Marciano.

I hope the situation can be attributed to a climate of peace and cooperation and is buried the hatchet in the air that I get excited, quest'ascia has caused pain a tutti.

Informo anche che provvederò a cancellare l’utenza ::Straker::

Ringrazio Andrea per la disponibilità e per aver capito il mio punto di vista.

Autorizzo la redazione di NEXUS a pubblicare, se necessario, questa lettera, omettendo di specificare le mie generalità.

Questa storia mi è già costata troppo.

In fede

EL

At this point one wonders if the real purpose of the complaint in question was to identify the " false "or not but harm us Straker and delegitimize our business ... How to remember those who have followed the first signs of this painful affair, the first spark was struck when we first accepted in the forums and even then elevated to the rank of "provocation" in a section such a Gucumatz, even though he reported that it was a character clearly problematic. Prompted by Marciano to remove him from the forum because he said it was a known member of disinformation CICAP, we have not agreed to do so, although it could also be who is said to be. We have clarified that the forum NEXUS everyone has the right to express their ideas. As Andrea says, the forum in our "waste" are "treated and recycled" (his specialty ...), it is a kind of "rehabilitation center" for the diverse humanity that attends: plurilaureati professionals, priests, gurus, contacted, all and more! This is why there are moderators, but provocative, worthy of "the worst bar in Caracas." It should be remembered that there are many ways to cause: who is to induce free, then find bread for his teeth, but instead of accepting the fact of civil confrontation with others creates between managers and participants in the discussions a fruitful synergy , a moment of personal and collective. Gucumatz gave us this opportunity, in return for the opportunity to understand something more.

In this topsy-turvy world, where conspiracy to pass the real skeptics, skeptics suspected drink any idiocy provided from official sources or "specialist", and free thinkers become disinformation, it happens that someone from appropriating unworthy of a name and then misrepresent that a change of person. Ed Bishop must be turning in his grave, but for us it remains the only true and inimitable Commander Straker, when we were kids, we defend our Earth from alien invaders. Thanks, Ed!

Maplestory Ring Of Moon Stone

STORIES RIGHT (KER) Falling

L’altra sera mi sono fatto una lunga chiacchierata col mio fraterno amico e gestore del forum di NEXUS, Andrea Rampado, allo scopo di fare il punto della incresciosa situazione che si è venuta a creare con Rosario Marcianò, which has seen fit to complain to us for defamation (article 595 / 3 CP), substitution of person (Article 494 PC) and unauthorized access of computer system (615TER CP).

Assuming that we had behind us as a member by the name of Straker (registered with the email address of the rosary . marcianò@gmail.it from which came the response verification) that is passed off as the real Rosario Marciano, the latter (Without feeling compelled, having regard to the criminalization of the charges, to contact us by phone for clarification or more) complained that after we were notified by the local police station. I will not dwell on the serious inconvenience to Andrea (who had, already in poor health, losing a day's work went by car up and down from Lombardy) and the loss of valuable time for me, nor the damage to the image and reputation of the undersigned and our respective activities. Never as in this case is the saying that "He who sows wind, collects storm" ...

I understand that Marco, who Is a computer expert, had already reported the networking activities of this person since June 2009, but since it has come to our forums to denounce it. On the other hand, Andrea, loyal to the Chinese saying that "if somebody puts it in c.. Or, do not move: his game you would!" Despite the call of "provocateurs" to freeze the forum, let me focus and merely waiting for the false Marciano came in the forum, has traced the IP, the company has tracked where the link originated in a jiffy and has unmasked. This is the result:

Good evening to all

I write these lines after becoming aware of what is really going on between Mr. Marciano and the drafting of NEXUS, I refer in particular to a complaint lodged by

Mr. Marc gained as a result of a growing misunderstanding between the two sides.

Somehow I have also entered in this story, in fact, quite innocently I had the idea to register in the forum with the nick of NEXUS:: Straker:: the nine of this September, what happened next is in the public domain.

is not public domain but that was my real intention in posting these interventions, however, that trace the thoughts expressed by Mr. Marciano in his blog www.tankerenemy.com .

First of all, it was not my intention to take possession of the identity of anyone, let alone to de-legitimize groped or cause problems to him or the forum of NEXUS.

My only real intention was quella di aprire un canale di dialogo costruttivo, attraverso una rappresentazione caricaturale di quello che era il clima instauratosi nei confronti di Armando De Para.

Erano volate parole grosse tra la redazione di NEXUS e i gestori del sito tankerenemy, si parlava di agenti infiltrati, paranoia e questo già da ben prima del mio intervento, quello che ho fatto io è stato di esporre questa contrapposizione che si era venuta a creare, in termini volutamente esagerati in modo da indurre una riflessione tra le parti e tra quanti leggevano quel susseguirsi di accuse reciproche.

Who has benefited from that attitude, I think anybody, and my speech, like it or not, however, has stirred up something, even if, unfortunately, has had the opposite effect of what I wanted to get a further tightening of the situation, culminating in a lawsuit to the drafting of NEXUS.

why I'm here to write this letter this evening, after a chat with Andrea came to the conclusion that what I regard, I extend my most sincere apologies to the operators of tankerenemy Antonio and Rosario Marciano, hoping that want to accept them and I repeat that my speech was not aimed at nor defamation, nor even to their discredit.

I offer my apologies for the preparation of NEXUS and Tom Wood into the extent to which my actions may have contributed all'inasprimento relations between them and Marciano.

I hope the situation can be attributed to a climate of peace and cooperation and is buried the hatchet in the air that I get excited, quest'ascia has caused pain a tutti.

Informo anche che provvederò a cancellare l’utenza ::Straker::

Ringrazio Andrea per la disponibilità e per aver capito il mio punto di vista.

Autorizzo la redazione di NEXUS a pubblicare, se necessario, questa lettera, omettendo di specificare le mie generalità.

Questa storia mi è già costata troppo.

In fede

EL

At this point one wonders if the real purpose of the complaint in question was to identify the " false "or not but harm us Straker and delegitimize our business ... How to remember those who have followed the first signs of this painful affair, the first spark was struck when we first accepted in the forums and even then elevated to the rank of "provocation" in a section such a Gucumatz, even though he reported that it was a character clearly problematic. Prompted by Marciano to remove him from the forum because he said it was a known member of disinformation CICAP, we have not agreed to do so, although it could also be who is said to be. We have clarified that the forum NEXUS everyone has the right to express their ideas. As Andrea says, the forum in our "waste" are "treated and recycled" (his specialty ...), it is a kind of "rehabilitation center" for the diverse humanity that attends: plurilaureati professionals, priests, gurus, contacted, all and more! This is why there are moderators, but provocative, worthy of "the worst bar in Caracas." It should be remembered that there are many ways to cause: who is to induce free, then find bread for his teeth, but instead of accepting the fact of civil confrontation with others creates between managers and participants in the discussions a fruitful synergy , a moment of personal and collective. Gucumatz gave us this opportunity, in return for the opportunity to understand something more.

In this topsy-turvy world, where conspiracy to pass the real skeptics, skeptics suspected drink any idiocy provided from official sources or "specialist", and free thinkers become disinformation, it happens that someone from appropriating unworthy of a name and then misrepresent that a change of person. Ed Bishop must be turning in his grave, but for us it remains the only true and inimitable Commander Straker, when we were kids, we defend our Earth from alien invaders. Thanks, Ed!

Wrought Iron Plate Holders

parallel convergences

Saturday, September 11, 2010, the date of ' meeting held in Milan from David Icke Meetup to which Paul and Attivissimo io partecipavamo come relatori sugli attentati avvenuti sul suolo statunitense nove anni fa, il gioco al massacro che qualcuno forse auspicava non c’è stato. Il fatto che io non condivida molte delle sue posizioni su svariati argomenti e non ne abbia stima a causa di certi suoi atteggiamenti spesso inutilmente arroganti e presuntuosi, tipici di chi è convinto di avere la Verità in tasca, non significa che egli non meriti quel rispetto che per mia natura porto nei confronti di chiunque faccia altrettanto. Il confronto, fatto salvo uno spiacevole episodio di intemperanza, è stato pacato e produttivo, anche se non mi è affatto piaciuto il tono inquisitorio e la maleducazione con cui venivo interrotto mentre argomentavo le mie risposte ad alcuni infervorati Attivissimo young sympathizers.

Assuming that with time available to me I could never fully explain the many anomalies resulting in these nine years of investigations into attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon and on United Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvania, nor steer them in a geopolitical context, I merely stated the amount and variety of associations and committees that seek to open a new investigation into the tragic events, and to provide some element of reflection, in my opinion deserving of further study.

Attivissimo was very detailed in sua esposizione e addirittura stupito che ancora si stesse a discutere di certe cose: è tutto lì, nel sacro testo, il Rapporto della Commissione sui fatti dell’11 settembre. Basta leggere. Date retta agli esperti, loro sanno di cosa parlano, voi a quanto pare no. Se vi dicono che è assolutamente normale che due grattacieli di centodieci piani crollino quasi a velocità di caduta libera sulle proprie fondamenta un’ora dopo essere stati colpiti da un aereo, e un terzo faccia la stessa cosa senza nemmeno essere stato colpito direttamente, non date retta al vostro buonsenso: credeteci. È nel rapporto del NIST. Io invece mi stupisco che lui ancora invochi una richiesta di fede in un rapporto “sbufalato” dal grande David Ray Griffin with his September 11 Commission Report. Omissions and distortions , let alone that of NIST, dismantled piece by piece by Mark H. Gaffney ( Dead on Arrival - The NIST 9 / 11 Report On The World Trade Center Collapse ). Ah, yes: the point is that they are not professional experts, do not have the necessary technical skills and therefore are not entitled to an explanation nor a refutation, as far as reasonable, convincing and detailed it is. In short, it's just a matter of certification, and all the arguments, the elements, facts and researchers who have not the Blue Sticker have no dignity to reply. But today, to make their voices heard are thousands of professionals from various fields (pilots, air traffic controllers, engineers, architects, professors, lawyers, doctors, soldiers, intelligence agents, politicians, artists, and so on and and so forth ...), supported by a minority of people in diverse and constantly growing. We truly believe that they are all (including myself) fall prey to a collective delusion?

I personally think that the question of jurisdiction is totally misleading, and it is the story to teach us: to take but one example, were the leading experts of their time to declare that "heavier than air flying machines are impossible" (Lord Kelvin, president of the Royal Society, 1895), that "The flying machines will eventually be faster, will be used in sport, but you can not conceive of as commercial carriers" (Octave Chanute, aviation pioneer, 1904); that "Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value" (Marshal Ferdinand Foch, French commander of Allied Forces during the last months of World War I, 1918), that "Land and orbit around the Moon has so many problems for mankind than science could be used for another 200 years to overcome " ( Science Digest, August 1948) or even that "Everything that can be invented has been invented" (Charles H. Duell, Commissioner of the Patent U.S., 1899). Paradoxically, the invention of the airplane it should not be engineers plurilaureati but two ingenious bicycle, Wilbur and Orville Wright, and an interest of their first flights were not at all the major newspapers of the time, but the Virginian Pilot , an unknown local newspaper. If we want to do the opposite example, the question arises how can the genius Nikola Tesla, who received the highest scientific recognition of the time and to whom we owe the most important technological developments of the last century, has been virtually erased from the books of history and collective memory, except to find a certain notoriety in recent years due to the so called press "alternative". I could fill pages with notions of this kind, but the concept is clear: they are often not academic qualifications to make history, but if anything the opposite.

I do not really like the term "conspiracy" (which ironically is well suited to some supporters of Attivissimo who fantasize about smoky communication strategies put in by myself at the conference to gain undeserved credibility ... too easy to talk about normal education and availability of a comparison!) as it is a cauldron that contains everything and its opposite, perfect label to buckle when you want to de-legitimize leaving anyone with a vision of reality and not approved of events and a deviant by the paradigms set by the review system. For example, sometimes have been associated with "those who do not believe that the man went to the moon," although he never wrote or said anything to that effect, I am convinced that man on the moon has been there all right , although not in the manner provided by the official version. If rejected in toto that the events of 11 September 2001, simply because of its obvious absurdity, and the countless contradictions and anomalies that may often have an explanation if taken individually, but certainly not collectively, if only for a simple statistical calculation (assuming that in the meantime, the statistic is not ... become a review). As I have already had occasion to remark elsewhere, my approach and that of Attivissimo are diametrically opposed: his is characterized by a reductionist scientism that seeks to break down everything in explicable factors rationally analyze every tree and does not see the forest . Mine is of a more holistic, comprehensive, professional deformation due to the fact that direct For years, the magazine NEXUS, which in Latin means "link". Hence the quotation of "parallel convergences" in the title: Despite the considerable openness to public debate, there will tend to move in front of the group of supporters of the official version and the skeptics (a psychological mechanism by Nikola Duper magnificently exposed during his excellent report, unfortunately missed by Attivissimo). And this also applies here the "perfect metaphor" of epistolary correspondence Gossage-Vardebedian (read it, it really worth it). This However, there is nothing to hold a public meeting again with more time available to speakers and descriptions on some specific points, perhaps the classic ten, chosen by myself and counterarguments by Paul Attivissimo: keeping the audience decide what will be the most compelling arguments and everyone can form their opinions freely. We consider that on Saturday as a first exploratory approach for further opportunities to meet and share, rather than confrontation and de-legitimization: while we have shown that this is possible, and I think a really great result. It is worth what they once said an essay: "The answer is only the point at which you tired of thinking. "

Wrought Iron Plate Holders

parallel convergences

Saturday, September 11, 2010, the date of ' meeting held in Milan from David Icke Meetup to which Paul and Attivissimo io partecipavamo come relatori sugli attentati avvenuti sul suolo statunitense nove anni fa, il gioco al massacro che qualcuno forse auspicava non c’è stato. Il fatto che io non condivida molte delle sue posizioni su svariati argomenti e non ne abbia stima a causa di certi suoi atteggiamenti spesso inutilmente arroganti e presuntuosi, tipici di chi è convinto di avere la Verità in tasca, non significa che egli non meriti quel rispetto che per mia natura porto nei confronti di chiunque faccia altrettanto. Il confronto, fatto salvo uno spiacevole episodio di intemperanza, è stato pacato e produttivo, anche se non mi è affatto piaciuto il tono inquisitorio e la maleducazione con cui venivo interrotto mentre argomentavo le mie risposte ad alcuni infervorati Attivissimo young sympathizers.

Assuming that with time available to me I could never fully explain the many anomalies resulting in these nine years of investigations into attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon and on United Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvania, nor steer them in a geopolitical context, I merely stated the amount and variety of associations and committees that seek to open a new investigation into the tragic events, and to provide some element of reflection, in my opinion deserving of further study.

Attivissimo was very detailed in sua esposizione e addirittura stupito che ancora si stesse a discutere di certe cose: è tutto lì, nel sacro testo, il Rapporto della Commissione sui fatti dell’11 settembre. Basta leggere. Date retta agli esperti, loro sanno di cosa parlano, voi a quanto pare no. Se vi dicono che è assolutamente normale che due grattacieli di centodieci piani crollino quasi a velocità di caduta libera sulle proprie fondamenta un’ora dopo essere stati colpiti da un aereo, e un terzo faccia la stessa cosa senza nemmeno essere stato colpito direttamente, non date retta al vostro buonsenso: credeteci. È nel rapporto del NIST. Io invece mi stupisco che lui ancora invochi una richiesta di fede in un rapporto “sbufalato” dal grande David Ray Griffin with his September 11 Commission Report. Omissions and distortions , let alone that of NIST, dismantled piece by piece by Mark H. Gaffney ( Dead on Arrival - The NIST 9 / 11 Report On The World Trade Center Collapse ). Ah, yes: the point is that they are not professional experts, do not have the necessary technical skills and therefore are not entitled to an explanation nor a refutation, as far as reasonable, convincing and detailed it is. In short, it's just a matter of certification, and all the arguments, the elements, facts and researchers who have not the Blue Sticker have no dignity to reply. But today, to make their voices heard are thousands of professionals from various fields (pilots, air traffic controllers, engineers, architects, professors, lawyers, doctors, soldiers, intelligence agents, politicians, artists, and so on and and so forth ...), supported by a minority of people in diverse and constantly growing. We truly believe that they are all (including myself) fall prey to a collective delusion?

I personally think that the question of jurisdiction is totally misleading, and it is the story to teach us: to take but one example, were the leading experts of their time to declare that "heavier than air flying machines are impossible" (Lord Kelvin, president of the Royal Society, 1895), that "The flying machines will eventually be faster, will be used in sport, but you can not conceive of as commercial carriers" (Octave Chanute, aviation pioneer, 1904); that "Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value" (Marshal Ferdinand Foch, French commander of Allied Forces during the last months of World War I, 1918), that "Land and orbit around the Moon has so many problems for mankind than science could be used for another 200 years to overcome " ( Science Digest, August 1948) or even that "Everything that can be invented has been invented" (Charles H. Duell, Commissioner of the Patent U.S., 1899). Paradoxically, the invention of the airplane it should not be engineers plurilaureati but two ingenious bicycle, Wilbur and Orville Wright, and an interest of their first flights were not at all the major newspapers of the time, but the Virginian Pilot , an unknown local newspaper. If we want to do the opposite example, the question arises how can the genius Nikola Tesla, who received the highest scientific recognition of the time and to whom we owe the most important technological developments of the last century, has been virtually erased from the books of history and collective memory, except to find a certain notoriety in recent years due to the so called press "alternative". I could fill pages with notions of this kind, but the concept is clear: they are often not academic qualifications to make history, but if anything the opposite.

I do not really like the term "conspiracy" (which ironically is well suited to some supporters of Attivissimo who fantasize about smoky communication strategies put in by myself at the conference to gain undeserved credibility ... too easy to talk about normal education and availability of a comparison!) as it is a cauldron that contains everything and its opposite, perfect label to buckle when you want to de-legitimize leaving anyone with a vision of reality and not approved of events and a deviant by the paradigms set by the review system. For example, sometimes have been associated with "those who do not believe that the man went to the moon," although he never wrote or said anything to that effect, I am convinced that man on the moon has been there all right , although not in the manner provided by the official version. If rejected in toto that the events of 11 September 2001, simply because of its obvious absurdity, and the countless contradictions and anomalies that may often have an explanation if taken individually, but certainly not collectively, if only for a simple statistical calculation (assuming that in the meantime, the statistic is not ... become a review). As I have already had occasion to remark elsewhere, my approach and that of Attivissimo are diametrically opposed: his is characterized by a reductionist scientism that seeks to break down everything in explicable factors rationally analyze every tree and does not see the forest . Mine is of a more holistic, comprehensive, professional deformation due to the fact that direct For years, the magazine NEXUS, which in Latin means "link". Hence the quotation of "parallel convergences" in the title: Despite the considerable openness to public debate, there will tend to move in front of the group of supporters of the official version and the skeptics (a psychological mechanism by Nikola Duper magnificently exposed during his excellent report, unfortunately missed by Attivissimo). And this also applies here the "perfect metaphor" of epistolary correspondence Gossage-Vardebedian (read it, it really worth it). This However, there is nothing to hold a public meeting again with more time available to speakers and descriptions on some specific points, perhaps the classic ten, chosen by myself and counterarguments by Paul Attivissimo: keeping the audience decide what will be the most compelling arguments and everyone can form their opinions freely. We consider that on Saturday as a first exploratory approach for further opportunities to meet and share, rather than confrontation and de-legitimization: while we have shown that this is possible, and I think a really great result. It is worth what they once said an essay: "The answer is only the point at which you tired of thinking. "

Home Remedies For Throat Cancer

Whenever


Whenever assist in my heart and I do not let the corrosive prejudices of a world devoted to nothing may spoil the beauty of desire,
sing whenever I leave my soul in ever new wonder of the seasons, each time
accept my nature and limits use to build,
every time I hear the magic of love that nourishes the daughters of the Goddess,
every time I'm truly myself, nor masks
without pretense,
without restrictions or poverty of spirit.

And what I want, what I hope, what I want and go after that now I can feed him for knowledge, beauty and passion for what they are and I'm discovering in my days.

Home Remedies For Throat Cancer

Whenever


Whenever assist in my heart and I do not let the corrosive prejudices of a world devoted to nothing may spoil the beauty of desire,
sing whenever I leave my soul in ever new wonder of the seasons, each time
accept my nature and limits use to build,
every time I hear the magic of love that nourishes the daughters of the Goddess,
every time I'm truly myself, nor masks
without pretense,
without restrictions or poverty of spirit.

And what I want, what I hope, what I want and go after that now I can feed him for knowledge, beauty and passion for what they are and I'm discovering in my days.

Gallbladder Cancer Ribbon Color

chemtrails, deception and Paranoia

The last thing is that I never imagined having to deal, here, issues that have little to do with the information and much to do with sterile and unnecessary controversies that do nothing but play all of those who would discredit this important topic (and I, like many of you know, very expensive) as that of the chemtrails. To avoid shooting the red cross, I will not name the main character of this unfortunate situation, but I think it's relatively easy for anyone to guess or find out who is talking ...

all began one day in which the character in question, known in research and dissemination of "chemtrails", said that the forum site NEXUS was literally "haunted" by debunkers and disinformation and even some that they had become moderators. Rather alarmed, I said that I studied the matter with the administrator of the forum itself, my friend and colleague Andrea Rampado, which sent him back to clarify. I did not fail to explain that the Forum of NEXUS, while reflecting the spirit of the magazine and website, was a creature of its own and very atypical. When, in front a due robuste Tennent’s, Andrea ed io immaginammo questo spazio di discussione, ribaltammo tutti gli schemi: gli iscritti inizialmente erano “seccatori”, per poi progredire a “paraculo”, “complottisti”, etc. (non mi sembra di aver ancora visto assegnato l’inarrivabile titolo di “Jedi”…); la figura del moderatore veniva cancellata a favore di quella del “provocatore”, uno stimolo al confronto, alla riflessione, alla condivisione, alla ricerca della verità e della conoscenza. Questo ha significato che nel forum non sempre le posizioni di certi “provocatori” riflettessero le mie, e viceversa, ma il dibattito era sempre basato sul rispetto e intelligence by all, and those who were relentlessly overdriven marginalized. Because of the many commitments have never been able to follow the forum as I wanted, but certainly the amount and quality of discussions and arguments were, and, from top class.

In short, between Andrea and Mr. X started an email dialogue of the deaf, and it has degenerated when some portions (and only some portions, estranged from the context) of the correspondence was from this 'last post on his blog, along with sensitive data of Andrew and epithets of the worst kind. Suddenly, the board of Nexus (and consequently the magazine, which for the Chronicle in Italy was the first to deal with chemtrails, back in 1998), its manager and myself are now colluding with the system, disinformation and sold (and the more you have, and so forth ...). When he discovered a conference organized in Milan on 11 / 9, which will participate as a speaker and which will also feature Paul "Goebbels" Attivissimo, open up the sky!

Who will have the opportunity to read his ramblings, should appreciate the tone of inquisition and content close to zero, ruling in full consciousness and independence of opinion which may have value. It must be said, however, that we are talking about di un ricercatore che ha prodotto molto valido materiale sull’argomento delle scie chimiche, tanto che abbiamo postato alcuni suoi articoli anche nel nostro sito (e addirittura favorevolmente recensito un suo libro sulla rivista). Purtroppo, la sua ricerca si è tramutata in ossessione, il suo attivismo in una crociata contro gli infedeli e la sua lucidità in paranoia: avrei dovuto intuirlo al primo indizio, quando alcuni anni fa se la prese con Massimo Mazzucco, a suo dire scientemente colpevole di aver utilizzato per la homepage del suo sito luogocomune.net un’immagine in cui (secondo lui) erano rappresentate delle scie chimiche… (disinformazione subliminale?) Sia quel che sia, questo è il triste risultato delle persone che si prendono troppo sul serio, che si sentono detentrici dell’Unica Verità, senza nemmeno rendersi conto del grave danno che arrecano proprio alla causa che sostengono di difendere. A sua parziale discolpa, riconosco che mister X ha subìto molestie non di poco conto da certi personaggi piuttosto equivoci, ma mi domando se almeno una parte di esse non siano state, se non istigate, quanto meno favorite da certi suoi comportamenti.

Avrei voluto spendere meglio questo tempo e queste energie occupandomi di questioni ben più importanti, ma questa puntualizzazione mi sembrava doverosa. Ora il vostro debunker vi lascia: l’11 settembre si avvicina e c’è un sacco di disinformazione to prepare and spread for the occasion ...

Gallbladder Cancer Ribbon Color

chemtrails, deception and Paranoia

The last thing is that I never imagined having to deal, here, issues that have little to do with the information and much to do with sterile and unnecessary controversies that do nothing but play all of those who would discredit this important topic (and I, like many of you know, very expensive) as that of the chemtrails. To avoid shooting the red cross, I will not name the main character of this unfortunate situation, but I think it's relatively easy for anyone to guess or find out who is talking ...

all began one day in which the character in question, known in research and dissemination of "chemtrails", said that the forum site NEXUS was literally "haunted" by debunkers and disinformation and even some that they had become moderators. Rather alarmed, I said that I studied the matter with the administrator of the forum itself, my friend and colleague Andrea Rampado, which sent him back to clarify. I did not fail to explain that the Forum of NEXUS, while reflecting the spirit of the magazine and website, was a creature of its own and very atypical. When, in front a due robuste Tennent’s, Andrea ed io immaginammo questo spazio di discussione, ribaltammo tutti gli schemi: gli iscritti inizialmente erano “seccatori”, per poi progredire a “paraculo”, “complottisti”, etc. (non mi sembra di aver ancora visto assegnato l’inarrivabile titolo di “Jedi”…); la figura del moderatore veniva cancellata a favore di quella del “provocatore”, uno stimolo al confronto, alla riflessione, alla condivisione, alla ricerca della verità e della conoscenza. Questo ha significato che nel forum non sempre le posizioni di certi “provocatori” riflettessero le mie, e viceversa, ma il dibattito era sempre basato sul rispetto e intelligence by all, and those who were relentlessly overdriven marginalized. Because of the many commitments have never been able to follow the forum as I wanted, but certainly the amount and quality of discussions and arguments were, and, from top class.

In short, between Andrea and Mr. X started an email dialogue of the deaf, and it has degenerated when some portions (and only some portions, estranged from the context) of the correspondence was from this 'last post on his blog, along with sensitive data of Andrew and epithets of the worst kind. Suddenly, the board of Nexus (and consequently the magazine, which for the Chronicle in Italy was the first to deal with chemtrails, back in 1998), its manager and myself are now colluding with the system, disinformation and sold (and the more you have, and so forth ...). When he discovered a conference organized in Milan on 11 / 9, which will participate as a speaker and which will also feature Paul "Goebbels" Attivissimo, open up the sky!

Who will have the opportunity to read his ramblings, should appreciate the tone of inquisition and content close to zero, ruling in full consciousness and independence of opinion which may have value. It must be said, however, that we are talking about di un ricercatore che ha prodotto molto valido materiale sull’argomento delle scie chimiche, tanto che abbiamo postato alcuni suoi articoli anche nel nostro sito (e addirittura favorevolmente recensito un suo libro sulla rivista). Purtroppo, la sua ricerca si è tramutata in ossessione, il suo attivismo in una crociata contro gli infedeli e la sua lucidità in paranoia: avrei dovuto intuirlo al primo indizio, quando alcuni anni fa se la prese con Massimo Mazzucco, a suo dire scientemente colpevole di aver utilizzato per la homepage del suo sito luogocomune.net un’immagine in cui (secondo lui) erano rappresentate delle scie chimiche… (disinformazione subliminale?) Sia quel che sia, questo è il triste risultato delle persone che si prendono troppo sul serio, che si sentono detentrici dell’Unica Verità, senza nemmeno rendersi conto del grave danno che arrecano proprio alla causa che sostengono di difendere. A sua parziale discolpa, riconosco che mister X ha subìto molestie non di poco conto da certi personaggi piuttosto equivoci, ma mi domando se almeno una parte di esse non siano state, se non istigate, quanto meno favorite da certi suoi comportamenti.

Avrei voluto spendere meglio questo tempo e queste energie occupandomi di questioni ben più importanti, ma questa puntualizzazione mi sembrava doverosa. Ora il vostro debunker vi lascia: l’11 settembre si avvicina e c’è un sacco di disinformazione to prepare and spread for the occasion ...